Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 20:26:20 GMT -8
The Court ordered the payment of a fine of R$ million applied by the Ministry of Finance against Banco Modal SA and an administrator for not having communicated to the Central Bank an operation worth R$ billion carried out by a client of the institution. The sentence also maintained the professional suspension for a period of five years of the employee responsible at the institution.
Modal and the administrator tried to suspend the penalty in court. One of the allegations was that the Ministry of Finance had increased the amounts to be paid for the infraction after an administrative appeal was denied. However the Regional Attorney's Office of the Union of the nd Region claimed that the Ministry's act which calculated the fine at around R$ million against Banco Modal and R$ thousand against the employee was supported by the opinion of the Control Council of Financial Activities COAF and the Attorney General of the National Treasury PGFN. He highlighted that the amount applied corresponded to the minimum provided by law of the value of the transaction carried out by the financial institution's client.
AGU's lawyers also argued that contrary to what was BTC Number Data argued the principle of reformatio in pejus in the administrative sphere would not apply to the case which would be the aggravation of the first instance decision made in the second instance reform. The th Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro accepted the Attorney General's defense and maintained the fine imposed by the Ministry of Finance denying the authors' request. The judge also ordered the bank and the employee to pay costs and legal fees of of the fine. With information from the AGU Press Office.
If the option of holding an auction in the State of São Paulo for the financial year is accepted it can be concluded that the of the funds that are under the power of the TJSP will be frozen in the public coffers since the effective implementing this payment method in such a short term is admittedly unfeasible.
Court determines retention of outsourced values
The Court ordered the retention of R$ that would be paid by the Brazilian Federal Revenue Office in São José do Rio Preto SP to the outsourced company Real Serviços de Locação de Mão de Obra Ltda. due to noncompliance. administrative requirements and labor infractions. The information is from the Terra portal .
According to the Federal Attorney General's Office in São José do Preto PSUSRR a unit of the Federal Attorney General's Office the company's service provision contract with the public body was terminated in November Before the official end the Revenue Department requested information from the contractor regarding the attendance and employment status of all employees assigned to the unit. However the request was not fulfilled.
Faced with the flagrant irregularity the th Labor Court of São José do Rio Preto SP ordered the blocking of credits in favor of the Brazilian Federal Revenue Office under the terms of contract DRFSJR
In court the Union's lawyers reported that in addition the company in disregard of the legislation fired a pregnant receptionist and did not pay her any termination rights. They highlighted that blocking the amounts that would be paid to the company in compliance with the contract would guarantee the regularization of the labor claims of the receptionist and other potential employees who found themselves in the same situation.
Modal and the administrator tried to suspend the penalty in court. One of the allegations was that the Ministry of Finance had increased the amounts to be paid for the infraction after an administrative appeal was denied. However the Regional Attorney's Office of the Union of the nd Region claimed that the Ministry's act which calculated the fine at around R$ million against Banco Modal and R$ thousand against the employee was supported by the opinion of the Control Council of Financial Activities COAF and the Attorney General of the National Treasury PGFN. He highlighted that the amount applied corresponded to the minimum provided by law of the value of the transaction carried out by the financial institution's client.
AGU's lawyers also argued that contrary to what was BTC Number Data argued the principle of reformatio in pejus in the administrative sphere would not apply to the case which would be the aggravation of the first instance decision made in the second instance reform. The th Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro accepted the Attorney General's defense and maintained the fine imposed by the Ministry of Finance denying the authors' request. The judge also ordered the bank and the employee to pay costs and legal fees of of the fine. With information from the AGU Press Office.
If the option of holding an auction in the State of São Paulo for the financial year is accepted it can be concluded that the of the funds that are under the power of the TJSP will be frozen in the public coffers since the effective implementing this payment method in such a short term is admittedly unfeasible.
Court determines retention of outsourced values
The Court ordered the retention of R$ that would be paid by the Brazilian Federal Revenue Office in São José do Rio Preto SP to the outsourced company Real Serviços de Locação de Mão de Obra Ltda. due to noncompliance. administrative requirements and labor infractions. The information is from the Terra portal .
According to the Federal Attorney General's Office in São José do Preto PSUSRR a unit of the Federal Attorney General's Office the company's service provision contract with the public body was terminated in November Before the official end the Revenue Department requested information from the contractor regarding the attendance and employment status of all employees assigned to the unit. However the request was not fulfilled.
Faced with the flagrant irregularity the th Labor Court of São José do Rio Preto SP ordered the blocking of credits in favor of the Brazilian Federal Revenue Office under the terms of contract DRFSJR
In court the Union's lawyers reported that in addition the company in disregard of the legislation fired a pregnant receptionist and did not pay her any termination rights. They highlighted that blocking the amounts that would be paid to the company in compliance with the contract would guarantee the regularization of the labor claims of the receptionist and other potential employees who found themselves in the same situation.